Treatment of Animals

Standing Up for Animals 

There are two main groups of people today who are against how we treat animals. The first group believes that killing animals is the same as murder. Some believe that people who eat animals should go to prison. They accuse people who wear animal fur of murder and sometimes attack them. They think that all animals should be released from farms and homes and left to go where they want. The basis for their belief is that humans are also animals; they fell that the closer other animals are to humans, the worse it is to eat them. They believe we should treat animals differently from other living things like plants.

The second group accepts that we use animals for food, buy they oppose anything that makes them suffer. This group feels that modern ways of raising animals are not suited to the animals. Animals should be raised in conditions like those in nature. For example. pigs once lived in forests and ate and plants. They are happiest when they have room to run around and some protection from subzero . But now, pigs are raised in very small areas and fed corn and soybeans. In this small, space, they produce a lot of waste. This generates many problems for the pigs' health.

Difficult vocabularies and the meaning 

> oppose : menentang

> generates : menghasilkan

> raising : pemeliharaan

> roots : akar
> subzero : dibawah titik beku
> treat : memperlakukan
> waste : limbah
> weather : cuaca
> against : melawan
> differently : berbeda
> raised : dibesarkan
> conditions : kondisi
> accuse : menuduh
> released : dilepaskan

Main idea of the paragraph

Paragraph 1 : 

There are two main group of people today who are against how we treat animals. 

Paragraph 2 : 

The second group accepts that we use animals for food, but they oppose anything that makes them suffer.

Standing Up for Animals

subject     = S

object      = O

To be       = Tb

Adverb      = Adv

Preposition = P

Conjunction = C

Verb        = V

Adjective   = Adj

 

      There are two main group(p)  of(c) people today(s) who are against how we treat animals(adv). The first group(s) believes that killing(v) animals(o) is(tb) the same as a murder(adv). Some(s) believes(v) that people who eat animals(o) should go(v) to(c) prison(adv). They(s) accuse(v) people who wear animal fur(o) of(c) murder and sometimes(adv) attack(v) them(o). They(s)  think(v) that(c) all animals(0) should be released(v) from farms and homes and left to go where they want(adv). The basis(adj) for(c) their(s) belief(v) is(adj) that human are also animals;(adv) they(s) feel(v) that the closer other animals are to humans, the worse it is to(adv) eat(v) them(o). They believe(p) that(c) we(s) should treat(v) animals(o) differently from other living things like plants(adv).

     The second group(s) accepts(v) that(c) we(o) use animals for food(adv), but they oppose anythings that make them suffer(p). This group(s) feel(v) the modern ways(adj) of raising(v) animals(o) are not suited to the animals(adv).  Animals(o) should be raised(v) in condition like those(p) in nature(adv). For example(p), pigs(s) once lived in forest(adv) and(c) ate(v) roots and plant(o). They(s) are(tb) happiest(adj) when they have room to run around and some protection from subzero weather(adv). But now(p), pigs(s) are(tb) raised(v) in very small areas(adv) and(c) fed(v) corn and soybeans(o). In this small space(p), they(s) produce(v) a lot of waste(adv). This(s) generates(v) many problems(adv) for(c) the pigs'(o) health(adj).